NAME
renice
—
alter priority of running
processes
SYNOPSIS
renice |
-n increment
[[-g ] pgrp ...]
[[-p ] pid ...]
[[-u ] user ...] |
DESCRIPTION
renice
alters the scheduling priority of
one or more running processes by increment. Processes
may be selected using the parameters pid (process ID),
pgrp (process group ID), and
user (user name or ID). If no flag is specified, the
default is to select by process ID.
Users other than the superuser may only alter the priority of
processes they own, and can only monotonically increase their “nice
value” within the range 0 to PRIO_MAX
(20).
(This prevents overriding administrative fiats.) The superuser may alter the
priority of any process and set the priority to any value in the range
PRIO_MIN
(-20) to
PRIO_MAX
.
Useful priorities are: 20 (the affected processes will run only when nothing else in the system wants to), 0 (the “base” scheduling priority), anything negative (to make things go very fast).
The options are as follows:
-g
pgrp ...- Alter the scheduling priority of all processes in process group pgrp.
-n
increment- A positive or negative decimal integer used to modify the scheduling priority.
-p
pid ...- Alter the scheduling priority of process pid.
-u
user ...- Alter the scheduling priority of all processes belonging to user, which may be a user name or ID.
FILES
- /etc/passwd
- for mapping user names to user IDs
EXIT STATUS
The renice
utility exits 0 on
success, and >0 if an error occurs.
EXAMPLES
The following example changes the priority of process IDs 987 and 32, and all processes owned by users daemon and root:
# renice -n +1 987 -u daemon root -p 32
SEE ALSO
STANDARDS
The renice
utility is compliant with the
IEEE Std 1003.1-2008 (“POSIX.1”)
specification.
The historical behavior of passing the increment as the first argument is supported for backwards compatibility.
The arguments to flags [-gpu
] are
extensions to that specification.
HISTORY
The renice
command appeared in
4.0BSD.
BUGS
Non-superusers cannot increase scheduling priorities of their own processes, even if they were the ones that decreased the priorities in the first place.